# | {{ resultText.questionCol }} | {{ resultText.answerCol }} | {{ resultText.correctCol }} |
---|---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.responseLabel }} | {{ a.correctLabel }} |
Cognitive reflection measures how often you override fast, gut-level answers and engage deliberate reasoning. The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) presents deceptively simple problems whose most obvious solution is usually incorrect. By comparing your first impulse with a more reflective calculation, the CRT gauges the mental shift from intuition toward logic.
This seven-question screen captures your choice on each brain-teaser, immediately tallies correct responses, and visualises the outcome with a minimalist charting layer. Because scoring equals the number of correct answers, your final figure between zero and seven instantly signals reflective tendency. Client-side storage keeps every selection private yet encodes them in the URL so results can be shared.
Professionals, students, and lifelong learners use the CRT-7 to raise awareness of biases that influence everyday judgements—from budgeting to strategic planning. Repeated use highlights progress in deliberate thinking and encourages metacognitive habits that foster sound reasoning. Avoid interpreting the score as intelligence; it only reflects one thinking dimension. Results do not constitute a clinical diagnosis.
Cognitive reflection describes the mental capacity to inhibit immediate yet often erroneous answers in favour of slower analytic reasoning. The CRT-7 extends the classic three-item test to seven calibrated puzzles covering arithmetic, logic, language, and framing illusions. Each item is designed so an intuitive response conflicts with the correct solution derived through systematic analysis, making total correct answers a simple but reliable proxy for reflective-thinking propensity.
Here ci equals 1 when your response to item i matches the validated answer, otherwise 0.
Parameter | Meaning | Typical Range |
---|---|---|
responsei | User’s chosen answer to item i | One of four options |
correcti | Validated solution to item i | Single value |
Score | Total correct answers Σ | 0 – 7 |
Level | Categorical band derived from score | Low | Medium | High | Very High |
The original CRT was introduced by Shane Frederick (2005). Subsequent studies by Toplak, West, and Stanovich confirm its predictive power for decision-making quality. Seven-item versions improve reliability while remaining brief.
The tool runs entirely in your browser, processes no sensitive personal data, and aligns with general data-protection regulations.
Follow these actions sequentially to obtain an accurate reflection score.
No. Answers remain solely in your browser and vanish on refresh.
No. It offers informal insight and should not guide medical or therapeutic decisions.
Yes, but repeated exposure may reduce diagnostic value as puzzles become familiar.
Literal translations may hide wordplay, potentially changing puzzle difficulty.
The expansion raises reliability while keeping completion time under two minutes for most users.