# | {{ texts.questionCol }} | {{ texts.answerCol }} |
---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
Optimism reflects a general tendency to expect favourable outcomes, whereas pessimism leans toward anticipating difficulties. Psychologists quantify this outlook using the Life Orientation Test–Revised (LOT-R), a brief self-report instrument containing carefully balanced statements. The scale isolates dispositional expectations from temporary mood, offering a stable indicator of how you habitually view opportunities, challenges, and unknowns.
By selecting how much you agree with each of ten statements, the interactive engine converts your responses into a score between 0 and 24. Positive-worded items add points, negative-worded items reverse the scale before adding, and four filler phrases are excluded from computation. The total aligns with normative bands classed as Low, Moderate, or High dispositional optimism.
Completing the LOT-R every few months helps track mindset shifts alongside gratitude journals, meditation, or cognitive-behavioural exercises. You might share the score with a coach or therapist when setting resilience goals. Interpret changes within personal and cultural context—numeric results guide reflection but never replace nuanced discussion with a professional. Results do not constitute a clinical diagnosis or mental-health treatment recommendation.
The Life Orientation Test–Revised (LOT-R) operationalises dispositional optimism through six scored items—three positively keyed and three negatively keyed—plus four fillers. Each response is captured on a five-point Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Scoring transforms all answers into a common direction so higher totals correspond to stronger optimistic expectancy.
Score Range | Interpretation |
---|---|
0 – 13 | Low optimism |
14 – 18 | Moderate optimism |
19 – 24 | High optimism |
Higher bands imply stronger positive expectations about future events; lower bands may signal a negative explanatory style or persistent worry.
Scheier, Carver & Bridges (1994) established factorial validity and reliability; subsequent meta-analyses link higher LOT-R scores to adaptive coping, cardiovascular recovery, and health-protection behaviours.
The instrument processes self-reported psychological data but stores everything locally, aligning with GDPR principles of data minimisation.
Follow these actions sequentially for the clearest result.
A total below 14 suggests fewer positive expectations and may reflect automatic negative thinking habits or situational stressors.
Yes, but spacing attempts by several weeks avoids mood contamination and yields more reliable trait estimates.
No. All selections remain in your browser memory and vanish when you clear the page or cache.
No. It screens dispositional outlook; only qualified clinicians can diagnose mental-health conditions.
They reduce pattern bias and disguise scoring intent; their responses neither add nor subtract from your total.