The SD3 reports average scores (1–5). Higher numbers signal stronger dark-trait tendencies.
Typical community means are 3.1 (Mach), 2.8 (Narc), and 2.4 (Psych). Scores > 1 SD above these means are considered elevated.
This screen is informational only; it does not diagnose any disorder.
# | Item | Response |
---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
The Dark Triad describes three socially aversive but distinct personality traits—Machiavellianism, Narcissism and Psychopathy—that shape manipulation style, empathy level and moral decision-making. Understanding individual positions on these traits clarifies relationship dynamics and predicts certain counter-productive behaviours.
This assessment delivers twenty-seven peer-reviewed statements, records your agreement on a five-point scale, reverse-scores negatively keyed items and averages each trait, producing three comparable 1-to-5 scores. A compact charting layer then visualises your results against normative values.
Use the tool to reflect on negotiation tactics or online interactions; results may surprise you yet should never replace professional evaluation. Results do not constitute a clinical diagnosis.
The Short Dark Triad (SD3) compresses a 64-item inventory into three balanced nine-item subscales while preserving reliability. Likert responses (1 = strongly disagree – 5 = strongly agree) feed a scoring routine that reverses specified items, groups them by trait and outputs mean values aligned to community norms.
Trait | Typical Mean | Elevated (> +1 σ) |
---|---|---|
Machiavellianism | 3.1 | 4.1 + |
Narcissism | 2.8 | 3.8 + |
Psychopathy | 2.4 | 3.4 + |
Scores above the elevated band suggest stronger tendencies toward the corresponding dark-trait behaviours; below-mean results indicate comparatively prosocial orientations.
Jones & Paulhus (2014) validated the SD3 against longer inventories, reporting Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.80 and stable factor loadings. Subsequent studies confirmed construct independence and predictive power for unethical decision making and interpersonal exploitation.
The algorithm processes only non-identifiable questionnaire data and therefore falls outside HIPAA and GDPR special-category definitions.
Complete the screen in three straightforward stages.
It suggests a pragmatic, strategic approach to relationships, often prioritising personal gain over collective welfare.
Reverse wording controls for acquiescence bias and ensures that agreement directionality aligns across all traits.
No. Scoring occurs entirely within your browser; nothing is transmitted or saved after you close the tab.
Minor fluctuations are normal, yet large, consistent changes usually reflect genuine shifts in behaviour or attitude.
You can, but remember the assessment is a screening tool; context and professional interpretation remain essential.