# | {{ resultText.questionCol }} | {{ resultText.answerCol }} |
---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
Loneliness reflects a subjective gap between desired and actual social connection. The UCLA Loneliness Scale-20 operationalises this experience through twenty brief statements rated on a four-point frequency scale. Researchers and clinicians use the inventory to quantify perceived social isolation across cultures and age groups, supporting epidemiological studies and targeted interventions.
This tool presents each statement, records your selected frequency, reverses the scoring of positively worded items, then sums all twenty responses. The resulting raw score, ranging from 20 to 80, is mapped to one of four empirical severity bands—Low, Moderate, High, or Very High—displayed on a semicircular gauge and summarised in plain-language guidance.
A community organiser might administer the assessment at the end of a month-long outreach programme to gauge whether participants feel more connected. Individuals can likewise compare scores over time to inform self-care strategies, yet remember that feelings fluctuate and context matters. Results do not constitute a clinical diagnosis and should guide, not replace, professional advice.
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3, 20 items) quantifies perceived social isolation by aggregating how frequently respondents endorse emotionally affiliative or distancing statements. Each answer contributes between 1 and 4 points, producing a continuous index that correlates with depressive symptoms, physical health outcomes, and social-network size.
Score Range | Band | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
20 – 34 | Low | Minimal perceived loneliness |
35 – 49 | Moderate | Occasional feelings of isolation |
50 – 64 | High | Frequent loneliness requiring attention |
65 – 80 | Very High | Persistent isolation warranting support |
The band contextualises raw scores, signalling when informal coping strategies may suffice versus when structured interventions are advisable.
Never
, Rarely
, Sometimes
, Often
.L
) – integer between 20 and 80.Validity established through convergent analyses with depression indices and test–retest reliability studies (Russell, 1996; Matthews & colleagues, 2019). Peer-reviewed critiques highlight cultural translation subtleties.
This assessment handles anonymous Likert responses only and aligns with GDPR guidance for non-identifiable data.
Complete the self-assessment in one sitting for the most accurate snapshot.
A validated questionnaire that quantifies perceived social isolation through twenty frequency-rated statements.
Most users finish in three to five minutes.
No. Responses are processed locally in your browser and disappear when you close the page.
Yes. Refresh the page or clear responses to start again; comparing scores over time can be insightful.
Each score band reflects relative perceived loneliness; see the Technical Details table for thresholds and implications.