Drag & drop a file here or click to browse
Processing…
{{ file.name }} loaded
File hashing creates a short, fixed-length hexadecimal “fingerprint” that uniquely represents a file’s binary content. Because even the smallest change alters the fingerprint, hashes are widely trusted for integrity checks, malware detection, and compliance workflows.
This tool lets you choose a cryptographic hash family, optionally prepend or append a random or custom salt, and instantly returns the resulting digest. A reactive engine processes everything locally in your browser, displaying the digest for copying or comparison.
Verify downloaded firmware, audit backups, or embed checksums in release notes to prove authenticity. Always provide the exact salt alongside the digest—different salts yield unrelated hashes.
Cryptographic hash functions transform input data of arbitrary size into a deterministic, collision-resistant, fixed-size digest. Properties such as pre-image resistance and avalanche effect make algorithms like SHA-2, SHA-3, MD5, and RIPEMD ideal for integrity verification and tamper detection, while salting mitigates rainbow-table attacks by injecting additional entropy.
H – chosen hash algorithm · S – salt (optional, prefix or suffix) · D – file data.
Algorithm | Digest Length (bits) |
---|---|
MD5 | 128 |
SHA-1 | 160 |
SHA-2 (224-512) | 224–512 |
SHA-3 (224-512) | 224–512 |
RIPEMD-160 | 160 |
Longer digests reduce accidental collision probability; algorithm choice may be regulated by organisational or governmental policies.
Example (file = "hello"
, salt = 1a2b
, suffix, SHA-256):
Result: 9F12…A3
(64 hex chars).
See FIPS 180-4 (SHA-2), FIPS 202 (SHA-3), RFC 1321 (MD5), ISO/IEC 10118-3 (RIPEMD) for algorithm specifications and security analyses.
No personal or file data leaves your device; the computation occurs entirely client-side.
Follow these steps to create and share a checksum:
No, hashing runs entirely in your browser; nothing is uploaded or logged.
Prefer SHA-2 or SHA-3 for modern security needs; use MD5/SHA-1 only for legacy compatibility.
It appends or prepends extra characters before hashing, producing a unique digest and defeating pre-computed tables.
Yes, but browser memory limits may slow performance; split archives when possible.
Both represent the same value; choose the style your workflow or API expects.